Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (115 mails)

< Previous Next >
Package naming & versioning
  • From: R Hannes Beinert <argovela@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 06:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • Message-id: <20051029135544.56159.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello!

I was curious if there is any standard (ad hoc, or otherwise) for
package naming, and the spec file version/release information
which includes provisions for (1) tagging the provenance of an
rpm to a particular packager/repo, and (2) still allows for
rpm-based installers to understand the proper package relationships.

Specifically, my understanding of existing packging conventions (in
part derived from practice, and in part derived from the SuSE Package
Conventions document) a package consists of:

<packagename>-<version>-<release>.<arch>.rpm

where,

<version> ::= <major version>.<minor version>{.<other stuff>}
<release> ::= <release number>[.<release version>]

and, it seems by convention,

<major version>
<minor version>
<release number>
<release version>
are numbers.




__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

< Previous Next >
This Thread
  • No further messages