Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-multimedia (101 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-multimedia] wodim/cdrecord
- From: Steven Sroka <sroka.steven@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:33:25 -0500
- Message-id: <AANLkTi=qLtm0EtY9DO1Yxji8a5SxKk+3nfLYrTQUdksi@mail.gmail.com>
On 1 February 2011 04:54, Dave Plater <davejplater@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Damn. This ballooned into a bigger issue.
Unless I misunderstood, Dave you said,
"And *yes*, his cdrecord is much better than wodim."
jdd you said,
"with wodim, the write takes forever (0x6 approx) and always fails at
fixing. The disk seems to be good though.
With cdrecord from Joerg, the write is done at full (4x) speed and
witjhout error."
So infact Dave you are incorrect in your previous email,
"One thing that confuses me is your experience of wodim is the exact
opposite of at least jdd and myself."
It seems both of you have had issue with wodim as well as me. It's the
original cdrecord that seems excellent. Not the other way around
When I read your were confirming above that your had wodim issues as
well, I asked why was it even included in openSUSE? No that, that is
the most important thing at the moment.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-multimedia+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-multimedia+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On 02/01/2011 01:00 AM, Steven Sroka wrote:
I've heared that the original cdrecord is better than wodim as well.I did a bit of research :
Plus, there are a lot of forums posts and bug reports regarding wodim
ruining DVD's and so on listed throughout a Google search.
I'd like to know, if possible, what are the difference between wodim
and cdrecord? wodim, according to Joerg, is bastardized and some of us
here can confirm that wodim causes problems, so what is the use it?
If cdrecord is the original program and wodim seems not be reliable
would it not be best to ship cdrecord and not wodim?
http://www.cdrkit.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jörg_Schilling
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/
http://schily.blogspot.com/
http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/cdrecord.html
One thing that confuses me is your experience of wodim is the exact
opposite of at least jdd and myself.
Damn. This ballooned into a bigger issue.
Unless I misunderstood, Dave you said,
"And *yes*, his cdrecord is much better than wodim."
jdd you said,
"with wodim, the write takes forever (0x6 approx) and always fails at
fixing. The disk seems to be good though.
With cdrecord from Joerg, the write is done at full (4x) speed and
witjhout error."
So infact Dave you are incorrect in your previous email,
"One thing that confuses me is your experience of wodim is the exact
opposite of at least jdd and myself."
It seems both of you have had issue with wodim as well as me. It's the
original cdrecord that seems excellent. Not the other way around
When I read your were confirming above that your had wodim issues as
well, I asked why was it even included in openSUSE? No that, that is
the most important thing at the moment.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
I've forwarded the mail to opensuse-factory in the hope that Jorge will--
reply to you.
Regards
Dave P
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-multimedia+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-multimedia+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-multimedia+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-multimedia+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |