Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-m17n (39 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [m17n] should empty keybindings be allowed in scim?
- From: Mike FABIAN <mfabian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:34:01 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <s3ty8d2tm9c.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
James Su <suzhe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> さんは書きました:
> Yes. And it's easy to fix. I can provide a patch against 1.2.0, so
> that you can commit it into SL 9.3.
Thank you, let's try that.
> Regards
> James Su
>
> Mike FABIAN wrote:
>
>>Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx> さんは書きました:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>Maybe it should be allowed to disable keybindings by setting them to
>>>>empty? Zhe Su, what do you think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Hmm, better would be some methode to disable it which leaves the keys
>>>untouched.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>For the trigger hotkey, maybe.
>>
>>But I think it might be useful if empty values for all configurable
>>keybindings were allowed. Maybe one does not need a certain function
>>at all and doesn't want to have it on any key in order not to hit it
>>accidentally. Then it might be nice to make the key binding empty in
>>the scim configuration dialog.
>>
>>Currently it is not possible to make such key bindings empty, if
>>nothing is found in the configuration files, fallback key bindings
>>which are hard coded in the source code are used.
>>
>>I think this would be easy to change to accept empty values to be able
>>to disable certain key bindings, but would that make sense?
>>
>>Zhe, what do you think?
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian@xxxxxxx> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
> Yes. And it's easy to fix. I can provide a patch against 1.2.0, so
> that you can commit it into SL 9.3.
Thank you, let's try that.
> Regards
> James Su
>
> Mike FABIAN wrote:
>
>>Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx> さんは書きました:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>Maybe it should be allowed to disable keybindings by setting them to
>>>>empty? Zhe Su, what do you think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Hmm, better would be some methode to disable it which leaves the keys
>>>untouched.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>For the trigger hotkey, maybe.
>>
>>But I think it might be useful if empty values for all configurable
>>keybindings were allowed. Maybe one does not need a certain function
>>at all and doesn't want to have it on any key in order not to hit it
>>accidentally. Then it might be nice to make the key binding empty in
>>the scim configuration dialog.
>>
>>Currently it is not possible to make such key bindings empty, if
>>nothing is found in the configuration files, fallback key bindings
>>which are hard coded in the source code are used.
>>
>>I think this would be easy to change to accept empty values to be able
>>to disable certain key bindings, but would that make sense?
>>
>>Zhe, what do you think?
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian@xxxxxxx> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。
| < Previous | Next > |