Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-m17n (31 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [m17n] And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy [Re: chinput vs. scim [Re: Problem with .xim on SuSE 9.1, Chinese zh_CN.UTF-8, miniChinput]]
  • From: Mike FABIAN <mfabian@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 14:00:55 +0000 (UTC)
  • Message-id: <s3tekle2n6z.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
James Su <suzhe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> さんは書きました:

> This package should be compiled against gtk2-2.2.x for SL9.1, so it
> can not work with gtk2-2.4.x.
>
> Regards
> James Su
>
> Marc Waeckerlin wrote:

[...]

>> So you mean the dependencies in the RMS of the apt4rpm repositories
>> are not correct? Then I should complain against the RPM builders. Or
>> probably the spec file is wrong, who provides the spec file?
>>
>>rpm -qip scim_1.0.0-0.1_i586.rpm -->
>> Packager is SuSE
>> Built on host gray.suse.de -> is this built by you, Mike?

Yes.

But I built it for SuSE 9.1/SLES9. I.e. this package is compiled against
*exactly* the libraries as they were on SuSE Linux 9.1. For gtk2 this
means gtk2-2.2.4-121.i586.rpm was used.

>>rpm -qRp scim_1.0.0-0.1_i586.rpm | grep gtk -->
>> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
>> libscim-gtkutils-1.0.so.0
>>
>>Is this correct? No dependency to gtk2-2.x.y?
>>
>>I have installed gtk-2.4.9-0.gbv.1


--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian@xxxxxxx> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。

< Previous Next >
List Navigation
Follow Ups