Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-m17n (31 mails)

by date

< Previous 1 Next >

03 September, 2004

12:44 Marc Waeckerlin Problem with .xim on SuSE 9.1, Chinese zh_CN.UTF-8, miniChinput

05 September, 2004

11:37 Mike FABIAN Re: [m17n] No skim panel in KDE 3.3
18:22 Andrej Keiper Re: [m17n] No skim panel in KDE 3.3

07 September, 2004

08:44 Marc Waeckerlin And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy [Re: chinput vs. scim [Re: Problem with .xim on SuSE 9.1, Chinese zh_CN.UTF-8, miniChinput]]
09:37 Mike FABIAN input methods for alphabetical languages (was: [m17n] And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy)
10:14 Rowdy Rednose convert UTF-8 to \uXXXX
10:48 Marc Waeckerlin Re: [m17n] input methods for alphabetical languages (was: [m17n] And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy)
11:38 Stephen Holmes Re: [m17n] convert UTF-8 to \uXXXX
12:19 Mike FABIAN Re: [m17n] convert UTF-8 to \uXXXX
13:02 James Su Re: [m17n] And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy [Re: chinput vs. scim [Re: Problem with .xim on SuSE 9.1, Chinese zh_CN.UTF-8, miniChinput]]
13:33 Marc Waeckerlin Re: [m17n] And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy [Re: chinput vs. scim [Re: Problem with .xim on SuSE 9.1, Chinese zh_CN.UTF-8, miniChinput]]
13:36 James Su Re: [m17n] And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy [Re: chinput vs. scim [Re: Problem with .xim on SuSE 9.1, Chinese zh_CN.UTF-8, miniChinput]]
13:37 Mike FABIAN Re: [m17n] And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy [Re: chinput vs. scim [Re: Problem with .xim on SuSE 9.1, Chinese zh_CN.UTF-8, miniChinput]]
13:41 Mike FABIAN starting scim on KDE (was: [m17n] And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy)
13:57 Marc Waeckerlin Compilation of SCIM and gtk2 version [Re: And the winner is... [...]]
14:00 Mike FABIAN Re: [m17n] And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy [Re: chinput vs. scim [Re: Problem with .xim on SuSE 9.1, Chinese zh_CN.UTF-8, miniChinput]]
14:17 Marc Waeckerlin Re: [m17n] And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy [Re: chinput vs. scim [Re: Problem with .xim on SuSE 9.1, Chinese zh_CN.UTF-8, miniChinput]]
16:06 Rowdy Rednose Re: [m17n] convert UTF-8 to \uXXXX
17:22 Mike FABIAN Re: [m17n] And the winner is... (or not?) SCIM is better, but buggy [Re: chinput vs. scim [Re: Problem with .xim on SuSE 9.1, Chinese zh_CN.UTF-8, miniChinput]]

09 September, 2004

06:03 Jethro Cramp The Virtues of SCIM or was that SKIM?
07:34 Mike FABIAN Re: [m17n] The Virtues of SCIM or was that SKIM?
< Previous 1 Next >
List Navigation