On Fri, Feb 22, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
That brought up the following questions: * is there really a valid usecase to putting lots of non-upstream(?) Hyper-V stuff into openSUSE kernels? Is there even a user who uses openSUSE on Hyper-V?
All the the changes go upstream, some may have to wait for the next merge window. My usecase, beside Azure, is that it can be tested almost right away by others and me without the need for a private tree.
* what about the former goal of bringing the openSUSE kernel closer to mainline, thus lowering the maintenance burden?
Where should the line be drawn? Sticking with kernel-vanilla for Factory? Olaf -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org