Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kernel (110 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-kernel] sysfs vs. xrandr support for manipulating display backlight brightness
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:33:40 -0700
- Message-id: <20111020133340.GA24211@suse.de>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 02:59:05PM +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
They are two totally different things.
xrandr should be using the sysfs interface the kernel exposes, if it is
present, otherwise, it might try to use some other interface, but it
should always be trying to use the sysfs one if it is there.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
can anyone give me a rough estimation of the level of sysfs
support for setting backlight brightness on common hardware
compared to xrandr?
They are two totally different things.
Basically, xfce4-power-manager has a bug in the xrandr backend
making it crash on resume
(https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707127,
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7851) and since
upstream is unresponsive I'm wondering what the cost/benefit of
temporarily disabling the xrandr backend would be, ie. whether
disabling the xrandr backend and relying exclusively on the sysfs
backend would break brightness manipulation for a large number
of users.
xrandr should be using the sysfs interface the kernel exposes, if it is
present, otherwise, it might try to use some other interface, but it
should always be trying to use the sysfs one if it is there.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |