Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kernel (48 mails)

[Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>]

On 9.8.2011 11:17, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 10:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 07, 2011 18:46:00 Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > On 08/07/2011 04:36 AM, doiggl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > Hello
> > > > How do you adjust or generate the series.conf for linux kernel v3.0.1 so
> > > > it can compile.
> > >
> > > We look what patches are contained in the stable release and prune them
> > > from the series.conf. Then we apply all the remaining patches from
> > > series.conf and fix the conflicts which might appear.
> > >
> > > > project is located at
> > > > --
> > > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=kernel-default&project=ho
> > > > me%3Adoiggl
> > > >
> > > > So far this this patch has failed in series.conf
> > > > *** patch ../patches.fixes/SCSI-fix-crash-in-scsi_dispatch_cmd.patch
> > > > failed ***
> > > > Thanks Glenn
> > >
> > > Why do you bother anyway? Kernel:stable already has 3.0.1 in.
> >
> > Mmh, but Kernel:HEAD does not have it - and openSUSE:Factory is still at 3.0,
>
> Yes, when I last asked if I should push stable trees into HEAD, I got no
> reply, so I'm not doing that. Hence HEAD/factory is now supposed to
> contain only "non-stable" releases and -rcs.

Jeff usually skips -rc1 in master, to avoid too much breakage (those who 
wish to test -rc1s can use the vanilla branch). So it IMO would not hurt 
to track the latest stable tree if there is no -rc2 yet. So that the 
Factory kernel shows some progress :-). But it's only my opinion.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx