Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kernel (89 mails)

[Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>]

On 11.4.2011 23:18, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/31/2011 11:51 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> > On 03/31/2011 11:50 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> > > On 03/31/2011 03:32 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> > > > On 31.3.2011 16:53, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> > > > > I like the idea. We don't ever modify those patches -- if we did, we're
> > > > > doing something wrong.
> >
> > > > Great.
> >
> >
> > > > > The down side is that replacing the entire tarball means that the OBS
> > > > > project gets a new tarball every time we do an -rc or -stable bump.
> >
> > > > Hm, right, I didn't think of that.
> >
> >
> > > > > That's time consuming when syncing the project. If we could work it so
> > > > > that it uses the incremental patches, that would be perfect.
> >
> > > > Automatically generating incremental patches would be tricky (and also
> > > > too much script bloat for a relatively little gain...).  But it should
> > > > be possible to eliminate uploading the upstream tarball completely if we
> > > > can use "source services":
> >
> > > No, I don't mean we generate our own. That would be a big pain. Our
> > > patch-2.6.xx-rcy patches aren't generated by us. Upstream does that
> > > already. They're from
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/incr/
> >
> > Oh, and the rcy-gitz patches are incrementally updated at
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/incr/ as well.
>
> Hi Michal -
>
> I don't suppose you've made any progress here? I'd like to rev the
> master kernel to 2.6.39-rc2, but if you've got something working here,
> I'll wait to do that.
>
> - -Jeff

Not yet, sorry. Try setting SRCVERSION=2.6.39-rc2 in rpm/config.sh, that
should work for now.

Michal
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx