Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kernel (75 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-kernel] RFC: Use tarballs for -rc and stable releases?
- From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:53:47 -0400
- Message-id: <4D94957B.5090907@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/31/2011 10:32 AM, Michal Marek wrote:
I like the idea. We don't ever modify those patches -- if we did, we're
doing something wrong.
The down side is that replacing the entire tarball means that the OBS
project gets a new tarball every time we do an -rc or -stable bump.
That's time consuming when syncing the project. If we could work it so
that it uses the incremental patches, that would be perfect.
- -Jeff
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk2UlXsACgkQLPWxlyuTD7IyTwCbBES6BbTUcg4KL3PGqygbf4dt
6O8An0nEdqu46T+hEeIHSbHUddF64T9t
=Sgxi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hash: SHA1
On 03/31/2011 10:32 AM, Michal Marek wrote:
Hi,
currently, -rc and stable release updates are done by adding patches to
patches.kernel.org/. Especially the -rc1 patches are *huge* and cannot
be paired with any other object in the repository, so their
gzip-compressed size adds to the total repository size:
$ git cat-file -p
b9044e3353ff21f12a86788a18cf36ba1071b6ab:patches.kernel.org/patch-2.6.37-rc1
| gzip -c -9 | wc -c
14627847
that is almost 14 megabytes. So I would like to propose to more or less
discontinue patches.kernel.org and instead use the SRCVERSION variable
in rpm/config.sh. This is already used in the vanilla and linux-next
branches and it works. Code changes are more easily reviewed in the
kernel.git nowadays, tar-up.sh and sequence-patch also work if you don't
have the tarball around (it generates one from git, which is arguably
slower, but works), so I think it's worth doing it.
I like the idea. We don't ever modify those patches -- if we did, we're
doing something wrong.
The down side is that replacing the entire tarball means that the OBS
project gets a new tarball every time we do an -rc or -stable bump.
That's time consuming when syncing the project. If we could work it so
that it uses the incremental patches, that would be perfect.
- -Jeff
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk2UlXsACgkQLPWxlyuTD7IyTwCbBES6BbTUcg4KL3PGqygbf4dt
6O8An0nEdqu46T+hEeIHSbHUddF64T9t
=Sgxi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |