Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kernel (109 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-kernel] Factory update to kernel 2.6.34-rc2 coming
- From: 0bo0 <0.bugs.only.0@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:48:41 -0700
- Message-id: <c67eed301003300748k440a423dqac592b427958a40b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
afayk, will .34 in either Factory or :HEAD pull btrfs only from
upstream mainline? or are there plans to pull/build a .34 +
btrfs-unstable branch?
i understand that 'they' are lagging behind in btrfs-unstable merges
into mainline, and that ultimately that's where the issue needs to be
resolved, but "would be nice" to be able to test
opensuse-"next"-kernel with a usable (btrfs stable/release @ v0.19 is
just too 'dusty' ...) btrfs.
just asking ...
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
uname -a
Linux nas 2.6.34-rc2-git3-5-xen #1 SMP 2010-03-29 21:26:59 +0200
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
more or less back in business ... thanks!
I've submitted this to Factory.
afayk, will .34 in either Factory or :HEAD pull btrfs only from
upstream mainline? or are there plans to pull/build a .34 +
btrfs-unstable branch?
i understand that 'they' are lagging behind in btrfs-unstable merges
into mainline, and that ultimately that's where the issue needs to be
resolved, but "would be nice" to be able to test
opensuse-"next"-kernel with a usable (btrfs stable/release @ v0.19 is
just too 'dusty' ...) btrfs.
just asking ...
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |