Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kernel (71 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-kernel] Re: 11.2 kabi vs. PM / yenta fix
- From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:04:56 +0100
- Message-id: <4AFC6A68.5080703@xxxxxxx>
Greg KH napsal(a):
Ok, let's just whitelist it.
The checks have always been there, and in cases where a kabi change
would require rebuilding and re-releasing some commonly used KMPs (it's
not just nvidia & ati, but also some out-of-tree GPL code we distribute)
and working around the change is cheap, we usually do it.
Michal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:13:34PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009, Michal Marek wrote:
problem is the new member in struct pcmci_socket. Can weI'd choose this option.
* just ignore this change (in worst case, some drivers will need a
rebuild for the next kernel update)
* hide the change from genksyms (do external drivers ever need toThat I don't know. Greg?
allocate the structure themselves?)
I don't know of any that would. I vote for the "ignore this change" as
it came from upstream, and any external driver would have to handle it
anyway.
Ok, let's just whitelist it.
And anyway, I didn't think we were doing ABI stuff for opensuse kernels,
is this a change?
The checks have always been there, and in cases where a kabi change
would require rebuilding and re-releasing some commonly used KMPs (it's
not just nvidia & ati, but also some out-of-tree GPL code we distribute)
and working around the change is cheap, we usually do it.
Michal
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |