Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kernel (79 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-kernel] Y here, M there
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:32:27 -0700
- Message-id: <20090905213226.GB21965@xxxxxxx>
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
But it's slower to boot. And 99% of all systems that we ship load both
of those modules.
And, by building them into the kernel, you actually save a bit of space,
as the kernel can throw away the __init section, which it does not for
kernel modules.
Does it actually affect overall performace and is it faster than the
increase in processor power and memory sizes?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Saturday 2009-09-05 21:51, Greg KH wrote:
Yes, this is true, but the original question was referring to the -rt
kernels, which I did not touch.
Anyway, what's the problem of having these drivers built into the kernel
and not a module?
That your kernel grows when doing that, and ipv6 itself already
contributes like 230K. scsi_mod another 140K, just to name two.
Even if you end up using them, it seems fancier having them as modules :)
But it's slower to boot. And 99% of all systems that we ship load both
of those modules.
And, by building them into the kernel, you actually save a bit of space,
as the kernel can throw away the __init section, which it does not for
kernel modules.
[N.B. Over the past year, the amount of modules loaded in a Linux system
rose near the number of the modules loaded in a Solaris 11beta system.]
Does it actually affect overall performace and is it faster than the
increase in processor power and memory sizes?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |