Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kernel (30 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-kernel] Suspending vs partitions on USB devices
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:51:43 -0700
- Message-id: <20080801155143.GB10834@xxxxxxx>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 02:57:36PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
No, it should not be.
Just leave it alone, we now have CONFIG_USB_PERSIST which should handle
this just fine. usb-storage should not be unloaded anymore in recent
kernels.
That fate entry should be rejected, do you want me to go do that?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
There's a fate entry (#300647, sorry for those who cannot have access to
it -- I'm asking if it can be made public) to have the desktop unmount
all partitions from USB (& firewire) devices when the computer is
suspended because unloading usb-storage would fail.
My understanding of all this is... not perfect :-) So here are a few
questions and hopefully the replies will help me:
+ can kernel people tell if this is still a potential issue?
No, it should not be.
+ if we need to do this, shouldn't the kernel just do it anyway?
(or maybe hal -- it seems weird to me to have all desktops implement
this)
+ what can we do for processes that are using files on those
partitions?
Just leave it alone, we now have CONFIG_USB_PERSIST which should handle
this just fine. usb-storage should not be unloaded anymore in recent
kernels.
That fate entry should be rejected, do you want me to go do that?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |