Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kernel (109 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-kernel] Re: time to branch 10.3 kernel tree?
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:30:27 -0700
- Message-id: <20071012163027.GA31624@xxxxxxx>
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:10:32PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:06:01PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 12 2007 17:43, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > >
> > >We have the usability issue that Laptop users look strange if a
> > >"bigsmp" kernel gets installed (due to NX support requirements).
> > >
> > >So we would really like a neutral name here.
> > >We are open for other suggestions ;)
> >
> > If you want to make bigsmp the default because of NX,
> > then just /make/ it the default (read: kernel-default.i586.rpm) already.
> >
> > Renaming bigsmp to pae does not reduce the work Bernhard Walle
> > pointed out ["And no, maintaining 3 kernels is not an option for us."]
> >
> > bigsmp, default, rt, xen, xenpae, uh, it's already 5 kernels :)
> > Maintaining an extra flavor (and I'm looking onto kernel-regular) does
> > not take much time.
>
> kernel-bigsmp -> kernel-default
> kernel-default -> kernel-nonpae
>
> Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
How about bigsmp -> default and there not being anymore "non pae"
kernel? Becides the memory size hit, what kinds of problems would that
cause? What machines still need the "nonpae" kernel?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:06:01PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >
> > On Oct 12 2007 17:43, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> > >
> > >We have the usability issue that Laptop users look strange if a
> > >"bigsmp" kernel gets installed (due to NX support requirements).
> > >
> > >So we would really like a neutral name here.
> > >We are open for other suggestions ;)
> >
> > If you want to make bigsmp the default because of NX,
> > then just /make/ it the default (read: kernel-default.i586.rpm) already.
> >
> > Renaming bigsmp to pae does not reduce the work Bernhard Walle
> > pointed out ["And no, maintaining 3 kernels is not an option for us."]
> >
> > bigsmp, default, rt, xen, xenpae, uh, it's already 5 kernels :)
> > Maintaining an extra flavor (and I'm looking onto kernel-regular) does
> > not take much time.
>
> kernel-bigsmp -> kernel-default
> kernel-default -> kernel-nonpae
>
> Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
How about bigsmp -> default and there not being anymore "non pae"
kernel? Becides the memory size hit, what kinds of problems would that
cause? What machines still need the "nonpae" kernel?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |