Am Freitag, 3. März 2017, 20:04:51 schrieb Antonio Larrosa:
Well, basically my reasoning was: If Qt 5.8 is not in TW yet, there must be some problem with it which makes it not recommended to be used yet. ... But if the general opinion is that Qt 5.8 is preferred... then ok, I'll just recommend that. Though that makes me wonder, why isn't it in TW yet?
The main (and AFAIK only) reason is Wayland: https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/distributions/2017-January/000161.html But as I mentioned, this does not apply to Leap 42.2, as it's not even possible to start a Plasma/Wayland session there.
Also, even if both combinations (K:F5 with Qt 5.7 or 5.8 in 42.2) would be unsupported officially, I still think using Qt 5.7 would be "more tested" since that's what we currently use in TW.
OK, but I don't think "more tested" is really relevant here. If somebody wants the latest and greatest Plasma5 (and walk upon "unsupported" paths), s/he would probably also want the latest and greatest Qt I think. (at least that's true for me ;-) ) Also, Tumbleweed will get Qt 5.8 sooner or later I suppose, and then that argument would no longer hold anyway... Kind Regards, Wolfgang -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org