On 14/07/12 18:12, Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
Hi
Dne So 14. července 2012 18:01:08, Basil Chupin napsal(a): [.........]
But, to be honest, why would anyone bother with amarok when there are more superior applications available, for example vlc or xine? Amarok IMHO is good application, I like it, it does what I want. VLC is good, but as far as I know, it does not work with collections in certain directory as Amarok does.
I would like to know what you mean by this. What "collections in certain directory" vlc won't work? vlc has yet to fail me in anything I want it to play/view/record.
And Xine IMHO is not so good.
With this I agree. vlc is superior to xine, although I used to use xine as a "backup" to vlc - until I installed the first test version of openSUSE 12.2 after which the wheels fell of xine (and the wheels have yet to be recovered) :-( .
What *I* would be questioning is why amarok automatically installed? And why also automatically install kaffeine which does the same thing as amarok, as far as I am concerned? Waste of space and time. Well, it is actively developed
Umm, would you like to rephrase this? :-) Applications which are being "actively developed" don't have 12-month old unfixed bugs :-) . BC
and it is default KDE application. It has a lot of functions, it works well. There is no reason to change it to let it broken for a year. ;-)
I think that you do need to rephrase your comments! :-D BC -- Using openSUSE 12.2 x86_64 KDE 4.8.4 & kernel 3.4.4.2 on a system with- AMD FX 8-core 3.6/4.2GHz processor 16GB PC14900/1866MHz Quad Channel Corsair "Vengeance" RAM Gigabyte AMD3+ m/board; Gigabyte nVidia GTX550Ti 1GB DDR5 GPU -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org