Tirsdag den 4. oktober 2011 12:12:11 skrev Sven Burmeister:
To repeat myself again. There is no maintainer for KUA! QA is not given. That's all that matters.
KUA has at least the same level of QA as any other unsupported OBS repo, i.e. none - except the maintainer himself (that would basically be me, though I call in the cavalry when I become aware of significant problems I cannot fix) using most of the packages on one specific distro version and arch. All QA besides that depends on users reporting problems. This is the same as for any other OBS repo, whether in the community repos list or not. Since KUA is limited to links to KDF the packages will actually have been tested somewhat before entering KUA, although in a different environment.
How do I know? Simply because there would not be a broken 1.9 package in there months after it built correctly (if ever) last time if somebody cared.
You still have not explained how the maintainer is supposed to fix something noone reported is broken. Or how he's supposed to know it's broken without testing every package on every distro and arch. Which doesn't not happen for any package in any unsupported OBS repo - whether in community repos list or not. On 11.4 the digikam 1.9 package works fine afaict. Btw. the offending digikam 1.9 package has now been wiped for 11.3. So no more 11.3 users will have any problems because of it. Thanks for reporting the problem. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@opensuse.org