On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Stephan Kulow
Am Sonntag, 4. September 2011 schrieb todd rme:
openSUSE:Factory rejected the herqq package because it doesn't comply with library naming conventions. It was suggested I use a name like libherqq0. There is a complication, however: there is no libherqq. There are two different libraries provided by the package:
libHUpnp.so.1 [.0[.0]] libQtSolutions_SOAP-2.7.so.1 [.0[.0]]
However, the name of the tarball is:
herqq-1.0.0.tar.bz2
There is also a -devel package whose name needs to be considered
So I see several possible solutions to this:
This seems to be a misunderstanding. The name herqq for the package is perfectly fine. Just herqq-libs as a subpackage was rejected. Leave that out in favor of real shared library packaging.
Greeitngs, Stephan
I don't think there was a misunderstanding in that aspect. I was not talking about changing the OBS package name, but rather those of the RPM packages that it generates (what you are calling subpackages). We are just using a different definition of "package". Of course if I had gone with option 3 than that would probably require changing the OBS package name as well, for all of the other options the OBS name would have stayed the same and only the RPM names would change. -Todd -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@opensuse.org