Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kde (297 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-kde] Port Camino to KDE?
- From: Roger Luedecke <roger.luedecke@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 16:14:39 -0700
- Message-id: <201107061614.40158.roger.luedecke@gmail.com>
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:38:25 AM todd rme wrote:
get a mutual dependancy. I can't remember a concrete example off hand, but an
apps dependencies should always be separate packages so far as I am
concerned.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Kim LeyendeckerIts probably a packaging goof. I have had to install some weird crap just to
<kimleyendecker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 05.07.2011 16:01, schrieb Roger Luedecke:
Does a default browser need to be fancy? If somebody finds themselves
missing a feature, then they already know what it is (Firefox) and
retrieve
it. As for learning curve, Rekonq is relatively soft thanks to its
simple UI.
I say we push it in the next release as default on KDE only. That way we
can
accelerate development on it, and give users a more unified experience
(for
those moving from Gnome or w/e).
and what´s with Konqueror? Will it stay on default or have I to install
it by myself?
thanks
Rekonq depends on konqueror, so if we do switch to rekonq then
konqueror will need to be installed. That is unless a new version of
rekonq removes this dependency, or if the dependency is a mistake on
the part of whoever made the openSUSE package.
-Todd
get a mutual dependancy. I can't remember a concrete example off hand, but an
apps dependencies should always be separate packages so far as I am
concerned.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |