Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kde (250 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-kde] version feedback please
- From: Sebastian Kügler <sebas@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:48:59 +0200
- Message-id: <201007271148.59685.sebas@xxxxxxx>
On Monday 26 July 2010 20:40:29 kanenas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Remove these two packages:
soprano-backend-virtuoso virtuoso-server. That doesn't completely "remove"
nepomuk, it just makes it completely non-functional. There's still the UI to
switch it on, although it won't work since you ripped the storage mechanism
out. Where possible, the UI will just not offer functionality that requires
Nepomuk.
BTW, you seem to be assuming that all files need to be indexed by
Nepomuk, that's not the case. You can disable file indexing altogether (and
still keep Nepomuk's functionality for example for finding contacts), or
specify which files should be indexed in a pretty fine-grained manner.
If
you've got fundamental or religious problems with a desktop indexer, you're
likely not interested in this, but for those who don't, it actually works
pretty well.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key
ID: 9119 0EF9
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Monday 26July 2010 04:18:41 am Sven Burmeister wrote:
remove any and all of the content indexers in the4. is there a way to
and strigi and still have a full fledged 64 bit 11.3?likes of nepomonk
advance,thanks in
another thread you said that nepo**** is part of kdebase4. "disabling"
You can disable both.
I asked about *removal*.
In
isbound to cause serious functionality problems in other apps or at some
soon to come downstream point. also integration of non-removable indexers
into the base package is of great concern to conspiracy theorists. yes i
have read the bit about multiple pim copies in memory and other such
things, but the argument is just not convincing, there are many much
simpler and infinitely more efficient ways to accomplish that. To have to
go thru every stored byte in the computer just so a few k of data is not
duplicated in ram simply does not make sense.
Remove these two packages:
soprano-backend-virtuoso virtuoso-server. That doesn't completely "remove"
nepomuk, it just makes it completely non-functional. There's still the UI to
switch it on, although it won't work since you ripped the storage mechanism
out. Where possible, the UI will just not offer functionality that requires
Nepomuk.
BTW, you seem to be assuming that all files need to be indexed by
Nepomuk, that's not the case. You can disable file indexing altogether (and
still keep Nepomuk's functionality for example for finding contacts), or
specify which files should be indexed in a pretty fine-grained manner.
If
you've got fundamental or religious problems with a desktop indexer, you're
likely not interested in this, but for those who don't, it actually works
pretty well.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key
ID: 9119 0EF9
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |