Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kde (115 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-kde] High Memory Usage in 11.1- KDE 4.2.3
- From: Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:34:26 +0200
- Message-id: <200905201134.26261.l.lunak@xxxxxxx>
On Wednesday 20 of May 2009, Anshul Jain wrote:
No. Doing something wrong the same way twice doesn't necessarily mean the
results will be wrong the same way.
I can't tell you much more than what I've already said, maybe except that in
benchmarking there is not much room for guessing.
--
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: l.lunak@xxxxxxx , l.lunak@xxxxxxx
Lihovarska 1060/12 tel: +420 284 084 672
190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@xxxxxxx> wrote:
One possible and very likely answer is that you are just not measuringYes, you're right...measuring memory under Linux is not an easy task
properly, since it's very non-trivial to measure memory usage on Linux
and 99.9% people get it wrong. See http://ktown.kde.org/~seli/memory/ .
If you are sure your numbers are right, then the easiest option would be
finding out what uses that memory.
PS: It is possible to get Exmap from home:/llunak:/mix repo, but it
crashes on 64bit for an unknown reason.
since it involves a ton of parameters. Now what did surprise me was
the difference in memory usage between 11.0 and 11.1 using the *same*
utility, i.e. htop. I can understand htop being a ways off in its
measurement...but a delta measurement between 11.0 and 11.1 should be
atleast some indicator...right?
No. Doing something wrong the same way twice doesn't necessarily mean the
results will be wrong the same way.
I tried to narrow down the specific app that consumed memory...and
didn't see anything going out of control. X, kded, plasma, krunner etc
used pretty much the same amount of memory as they did in
11.0...except that the overall usage was considerably higher. Maybe
its the kernel? I wouldn't know...just guessing thats all.
I can't tell you much more than what I've already said, maybe except that in
benchmarking there is not much room for guessing.
--
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: l.lunak@xxxxxxx , l.lunak@xxxxxxx
Lihovarska 1060/12 tel: +420 284 084 672
190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |