Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kde (199 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-kde] what's the point with KDE 4...
- From: Sven Burmeister <sven.burmeister@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:10:30 +0100
- Message-id: <200903191310.31295.sven.burmeister@xxxxxxx>
Am Donnerstag, 19. März 2009 12:37:53 schrieb Jens Nixdorf:
"Always" means "always", if you do not want people to understand it that way,
please pick another word and do not blame others for reading what you wrote.
How lame is that? You can place that phrase in any discussion and it does not
mean/add anything.
Answering a question with a question, nice.
You call me a nitpicker because you used the word "always" and I understood it
the only way it can be, i.e. "always"? Honestly, that's lame. "Always" is
absolute, there is no room for interpretation.
Exaggerating to not have to admit that "always" is a word easily replaced by a
less absolute word like e.g. "often" if one did not intend to state "always".
It's just too obvious.
Sven
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sven Burmeister schrieb:
Pick the question of mail that started this discussion and should have
got a sensible answer:
I was answering in this thread because it developes in a discussion about
KDE and the handling of it and the behaviour of some people which are
somehow connected to this topic. But in my posting i was referring to the
KDE-issue generally, not to the threadstarter-posting specifically.
"Always" means "always", if you do not want people to understand it that way,
please pick another word and do not blame others for reading what you wrote.
And if i read ahead in your answer to my posting, it seems that youre
answering just confirms my statements.
How lame is that? You can place that phrase in any discussion and it does not
mean/add anything.
Further your "Always" is most certainly wrong since only a single helping
answer in the archives would be enough. I bet there are more. So why
did you use "always", is that the kind of not exaggerating that helps a
constructive discussion?
This question i could give straight back. Do you think that your answering
style is right adjusted corresponding to the text of the posting you have
answered to, or ist it affected by your mood, maybe to much?
Answering a question with a question, nice.
Or are you
just nitpicking?
You call me a nitpicker because you used the word "always" and I understood it
the only way it can be, i.e. "always"? Honestly, that's lame. "Always" is
absolute, there is no room for interpretation.
Do you really expect that i replace my "always" with an
exact statistic how much good and bad answers are giving to how many
good or bad questions?
Exaggerating to not have to admit that "always" is a word easily replaced by a
less absolute word like e.g. "often" if one did not intend to state "always".
It's just too obvious.
Sven
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |