Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kde (199 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-kde] what's the point with KDE 4...
- From: Jens Nixdorf <jens.nixdorf.liste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:37:53 +0100
- Message-id: <26ec1a7d7c3bb4433af5f06ff54c2bfb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sven Burmeister schrieb:
I was answering in this thread because it developes in a discussion about
KDE and the handling of it and the behaviour of some people which are
somehow connected to this topic. But in my posting i was referring to the
KDE-issue generally, not to the threadstarter-posting specifically.
And if i read ahead in your answer to my posting, it seems that youre
answering just confirms my statements.
This question i could give straight back. Do you think that your answering
style is right adjusted corresponding to the text of the posting you have
answered to, or ist it affected by your mood, maybe to much? Or are you
just nitpicking? Do you really expect that i replace my "always" with an
exact statistic how much good and bad answers are giving to how many
good or bad questions?
This wasnt denied by me, in no word in my last posting.
But while we are just at it: I think, that most people didnt want to stay in
that dead-end, but they also didnt want to hear "always" how good KDE4 is,
and if they then stumble across some glitches in it and sending some of
the common "but this was working fine in KDE3"-Mails to the list, they
shouldnt be overwhelmed with a flamewar.
regards, Jens
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Pick the question of mail that started this discussion and should have
got a sensible answer:
I was answering in this thread because it developes in a discussion about
KDE and the handling of it and the behaviour of some people which are
somehow connected to this topic. But in my posting i was referring to the
KDE-issue generally, not to the threadstarter-posting specifically.
And if i read ahead in your answer to my posting, it seems that youre
answering just confirms my statements.
Further your "Always" is most certainly wrong since only a single helping
answer in the archives would be enough. I bet there are more. So why
did you use "always", is that the kind of not exaggerating that helps a
constructive discussion?
This question i could give straight back. Do you think that your answering
style is right adjusted corresponding to the text of the posting you have
answered to, or ist it affected by your mood, maybe to much? Or are you
just nitpicking? Do you really expect that i replace my "always" with an
exact statistic how much good and bad answers are giving to how many
good or bad questions?
KDE4 is the future and KDE3 a dead-end, the reasons have been
mediated more than once. The dead-end still exists and if I am not
mistaken SLEx will still support it for some more years. If people want
to stay in that dead-end, fair enough, yet it won't move forward and
die in the end.
This wasnt denied by me, in no word in my last posting.
But while we are just at it: I think, that most people didnt want to stay in
that dead-end, but they also didnt want to hear "always" how good KDE4 is,
and if they then stumble across some glitches in it and sending some of
the common "but this was working fine in KDE3"-Mails to the list, they
shouldnt be overwhelmed with a flamewar.
regards, Jens
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |