Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kde (132 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
RE: [suse-kde] KDE 3.4.1 released
- From: "Black, Alain" <ablack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 12:42:28 -0700
- Message-id: <1066BDF1DAAA8040B54E0B5E27097310062CDEAF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I agree. Personally, I really like Yast, but some things are difficult
to find. Like the new repackaged ATI drivers for 9.3 x86_64 are under
the i386/Supplementary, which made them rather difficult for me to find
at first.
I appreciate the effort that the SuSE folks go through to repackage so
much for us, I'm just sometimes confused by where they choose to
distribute the 64bit packages.
There is an x86_64/Supplementary, but it does not even contain a link to
the ATI drivers.
-Alain.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charly Baker [mailto:cmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:34 PM
To: suse-kde@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [suse-kde] KDE 3.4.1 released
[snip]
I would be happy to stick to Yast too, if it worked. The problem is
that I
simply can't find yast sources for all of the other packages that come
on the
cd's, nor can I find any doc's to describe it. Why would suse make such
a
good tool, but obscure the sources to the point where I can't afford to
spend
any more time looking. Why make the directory structures so
incomprehensible?
Charly Baker
to find. Like the new repackaged ATI drivers for 9.3 x86_64 are under
the i386/Supplementary, which made them rather difficult for me to find
at first.
I appreciate the effort that the SuSE folks go through to repackage so
much for us, I'm just sometimes confused by where they choose to
distribute the 64bit packages.
There is an x86_64/Supplementary, but it does not even contain a link to
the ATI drivers.
-Alain.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charly Baker [mailto:cmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:34 PM
To: suse-kde@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [suse-kde] KDE 3.4.1 released
[snip]
I would be happy to stick to Yast too, if it worked. The problem is
that I
simply can't find yast sources for all of the other packages that come
on the
cd's, nor can I find any doc's to describe it. Why would suse make such
a
good tool, but obscure the sources to the point where I can't afford to
spend
any more time looking. Why make the directory structures so
incomprehensible?
Charly Baker
| < Previous | Next > |