Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kde (218 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [suse-kde] konqueror security fix (kde2.2.2) [REPOST]
- From: Ben Rosenberg <ben@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 23:29:43 -0700
- Message-id: <20020907062943.GD6541@xxxxxxxxx>
* dh (ob1@xxxxxxxxx) [020906 20:35]:
::On Saturday 01 September 2029 01:24 pm, I wrote:
::> I recently read about an ssl verification problem w/ Konqueror.
::> When I went to konqueror.org it was stated that there was a patch for
::> the 2.2 series but that they (of course) recommend upgrading to
::> kde3.0.3 instead.
::> I'm actually pretty happy w/ kde2.2.2 and haven't found anything in
::> the 3.0 series that makes me want to switch (I've actually run into
::> more things that I don't like)
::> So I'd like to know, Is SuSE going to, or have they already released
::> a fixed version of konq for kde 2.2? If so where do I get it.
::
::I didn't recieve any reply so I thought I'd try again.
They said 2.2.X wasn't vulnerable in the same way that 3.X is but they
would be patching what they saw as any problem with the 2.2.x version.
If you've got the latest and greatest from the supplementry directory
for 2.2.X then I would suppose it's fixed.
--
Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@xxxxxxxxx
Tell me what you believe..
I tell you what you should see.
::On Saturday 01 September 2029 01:24 pm, I wrote:
::> I recently read about an ssl verification problem w/ Konqueror.
::> When I went to konqueror.org it was stated that there was a patch for
::> the 2.2 series but that they (of course) recommend upgrading to
::> kde3.0.3 instead.
::> I'm actually pretty happy w/ kde2.2.2 and haven't found anything in
::> the 3.0 series that makes me want to switch (I've actually run into
::> more things that I don't like)
::> So I'd like to know, Is SuSE going to, or have they already released
::> a fixed version of konq for kde 2.2? If so where do I get it.
::
::I didn't recieve any reply so I thought I'd try again.
They said 2.2.X wasn't vulnerable in the same way that 3.X is but they
would be patching what they saw as any problem with the 2.2.x version.
If you've got the latest and greatest from the supplementry directory
for 2.2.X then I would suppose it's fixed.
--
Ben Rosenberg ---===---===---===--- mailto:ben@xxxxxxxxx
Tell me what you believe..
I tell you what you should see.
| < Previous | Next > |