Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-java (9 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-java] OpenJDK7 is going to Factory
- From: Michal Vyskocil <mvyskocil@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:58:57 +0200
- Message-id: <20120510145857.GE22211@zelva.suse.cz>
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 05:12:11PM +0300, Robert Munteanu wrote:
z On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Michal Vyskocil <mvyskocil@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hallo Robert,
thanks a lot for testing, I really appreciate that
Good point, alternatives has to be increased - I've used 17147. Commited
as a revision 9.
My fresh private rebuild using openjdk7 itself (IOW not applicable for
Factory) says
/usr/lib64/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk/jre/bin/java -version
java version "1.7.0_b147-icedtea"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (suse-1-x86_64)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 22.0-b10, mixed mode)
I suspect you have still the original package. Please take a loot at rpm
-q --changelog java-1_7_0-openjdk
But I've found the fileconflict between openjdk6 and openjdk7, which has
to be fixed as well.
$ rpm -ivh java-1_7_0-openjdk-1.7.0.0_147-1.x86_64.rpm
Preparing... ###########################################
[100%]
file /usr/share/applications/policytool.desktop from install of
java-1_7_0-openjdk-1.7.0.0_147-1.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package java-1_6_0-openjdk-1.6.0.0_b24.1.11.1-3.2.x86_64
but the point is, it has to be fixed in both packages :-(
Best regards
Michal Vyskocil
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-java+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-java+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
z On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Michal Vyskocil <mvyskocil@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hallo all,
as you might know, Oracle have announced the end of general support for
jdk6 in November 2012. In order to have maintenable system, we have to
follow and switch to jdk7 as well.
I have just sumbitted the java-1_7_0-openjdk to Java:openjdk6:Factory -
this release is based on icedtea-2.1, openjdk b147 and should be an
equivalent of Oracle Java 7 u2.
Hi Michal,
Hallo Robert,
thanks a lot for testing, I really appreciate that
Installing this package in 12.1 alongside java-1_6_0-openjdk leaves
1_6_0 as the default since it has a higher priority in
/etc/alternatives.
/usr/lib64/jvm/jre-1.6.0-openjdk/bin/java - priority 17105
/usr/lib64/jvm/jre-1.7.0-openjdk/bin/java - priority 17100
Is this intended?
Good point, alternatives has to be increased - I've used 17147. Commited
as a revision 9.
Also, java -version outputs
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.0) (SUSE LINUX build
1.7.0_147-icedtea-b147)
Which seems to indicate that it is based on icedtea-2.0, rather than
2.1 as you wrote.
My fresh private rebuild using openjdk7 itself (IOW not applicable for
Factory) says
/usr/lib64/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk/jre/bin/java -version
java version "1.7.0_b147-icedtea"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (suse-1-x86_64)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 22.0-b10, mixed mode)
I suspect you have still the original package. Please take a loot at rpm
-q --changelog java-1_7_0-openjdk
But I've found the fileconflict between openjdk6 and openjdk7, which has
to be fixed as well.
$ rpm -ivh java-1_7_0-openjdk-1.7.0.0_147-1.x86_64.rpm
Preparing... ###########################################
[100%]
file /usr/share/applications/policytool.desktop from install of
java-1_7_0-openjdk-1.7.0.0_147-1.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package java-1_6_0-openjdk-1.6.0.0_b24.1.11.1-3.2.x86_64
but the point is, it has to be fixed in both packages :-(
Best regards
Michal Vyskocil
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-java+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-java+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |