Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-invis (26 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-invis] Software choices
  • From: Jörg Stephan <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:28:25 +0100
  • Message-id: <4CD3B219.5040607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Am 04.11.2010 17:39, schrieb Markus Benedikt:

I should have gone more into detail - I'm sorry! For clarification: I
have several customers with tight connections to the pharmaceutic
industry that have to have fully redundant systems for regulatory
reasons (FDA/GxP/ISO)- that is why I don't use the typical
Atom-CPUed-twin-SATA micro systems the invis concept is actually
targeted at. I mainly use HPs DL 385/585s with it's large cached,
battery backed SAS and SCSI controllers and at least twin quadcore
opterons for redundancy reasons. These setups typically perform better
under heavy loads with lots of single apps which can each grab a cpu
core and make use of those 7plus disked arrays.

I don't agree with a half working system being worse than a completely
out of order one. If 50 people can't do their jobs it's not as hard on
a company's budgets as if there were 100 - or all ov them ...

You are absolutely right with your concerns about ease of
administration but I'm selling these services ;-)

Maybe a fork each of "invis light" and "invis heavy" should be
considered ...

Cheers


Well, now it makes (a bit more) sense. So, for me, we can stop the DB
discussion.

Jörg
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-invis+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-invis+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >