Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (75 mails)

[Stanislav Brabec <sbrabec@xxxxxxx>]

Magnus Boman wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 16:59 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:

> > I fully agree. You have just to think whether GTK+ should have a
> > separate repository or not.
>
> What would be the reason to put GTK+ in a separate repository?

For projects, that depend just only on the latest GTK+. But it is
probably overkill.

> > > If people like the idea, we can probably start by listing packages where
> > > the rdiff between openSUSE:11.1 and G:S:2.26 is empty.
> >
> > And reversely packages with version 2.26.x will become a part of  G:S
> > automatically.
> >
> > I propose to move the rest to GNOME:APPLICATIONS or something similar.
> > In difference to GNOME:Community it would be uses as a base for Factory.
>
> Do you mean something like GNOME:Apps:2.26, GNOME:Apps:2.28 etc?

No. I think about a single repository to prevent multiple copies of the
same binary.

These packages don't follow GNOME release cycle and most of them don't
depend on the latest GNOME version => there is no reason to split them
per GNOME version.

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravem,

Stanislav Brabec
software developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o.                          e-mail: sbrabec@xxxxxxx
Lihovarská 1060/12           tel: +420 284 028 966, +49 911 740538747
190 00 Praha 9                                  fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic                                    http://www.suse.cz/

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx