Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (69 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-gnome] Removing nautilus-cd-burner from G:F
- From: Luis Medinas <lmedinas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:56:51 +0000
- Message-id: <4a817280903040356p3dc52298hcd6c1e374578015a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi
For GNOME 2.26, nautilus-cd-burner as been marked deprecated[1] in
favor of Brasero.
Currently G:F has 3 packages depending on it, rhythmbox, f-spot and
gnome-python-desktop.
For rhythmbox[2] and f-spot[3] there is a patch on upstream waiting to
be reviewed and commited to the tree.
As for gnome-python-desktop there are also bindings for brasero in
development and the current ncb
bindings could be disabled.
So should we keep ncb in G:F until 2.28, remove it or move it to G:C ?
Luis
[1] - http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-January/msg00067.html
[2] - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536732
[3] - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569413
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For GNOME 2.26, nautilus-cd-burner as been marked deprecated[1] in
favor of Brasero.
Currently G:F has 3 packages depending on it, rhythmbox, f-spot and
gnome-python-desktop.
For rhythmbox[2] and f-spot[3] there is a patch on upstream waiting to
be reviewed and commited to the tree.
As for gnome-python-desktop there are also bindings for brasero in
development and the current ncb
bindings could be disabled.
So should we keep ncb in G:F until 2.28, remove it or move it to G:C ?
Luis
[1] - http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2009-January/msg00067.html
[2] - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536732
[3] - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569413
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |