Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (124 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-gnome] Status of G:F:N merge
- From: Magnus Boman <captain.magnus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:07:59 +1100
- Message-id: <1232996879.11583.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 15:48 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Wouldn't it be enough to have gtk2 or glib2 depend on this new package
(filesystem-gnome?). Or do we have any packages in need of those
directories that also wouldn't need gtk2/glib2?
Cheers,
Magnus
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Le lundi 26 janvier 2009, à 15:26 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
I'll continue at some point this week, but people should feel free to
finish the work ;-)
I forgot to mention -- a few packages fail to build. For some, it's only
because it's an old version (gnome-utils, eg). For others, it's only a
directory ownership issue (most probably on /usr/share/gnome/help that
is owned by libgnome).
For this second issue, I was wondering what to do. I'm not really happy
with having all packages owning the same directory, but it's bad to
require libgnome too.
So maybe we should create a filesystem-gnome package that contain some
common directories? There are quite some directories that could be
there:
/usr/share/gnome
/usr/share/gnome/help
/usr/share/gnome/autostart
/usr/share/omf
/usr/share/gtk-doc
/usr/share/icons/HighContrastLargePrint
I'm sure there are others...
Any opinion on this? And also, how would we have this package
automatically installed? I wouldn't want to have all packages require it
:/
Wouldn't it be enough to have gtk2 or glib2 depend on this new package
(filesystem-gnome?). Or do we have any packages in need of those
directories that also wouldn't need gtk2/glib2?
Cheers,
Magnus
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |