Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (124 mails)

[JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 03:57 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le jeudi 15 janvier 2009, à 07:38 +1100, Magnus Boman a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:12 +0530, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:23 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > > > 1. Should we copy all packages from G:F to a GNOME:Stable (I think we
> > > > > have a G:S but don't know the state of it. We might want to start from
> > > > > scratch here) and then update to 2.24.3
> > > > might be a good idea, I guess
> > >
> > > +1
> >
> > Ok, so remaining questions are, do we use copypac or links? Using links
> > will put some maintenance burden on the project beyond just having the
> > latest stable GNOME release, since packages will break every now and
> > again when patches are created for 11.1/GNOME components.
> >
> > Also, is G:S enough, or should we have a sub-project called G:S:2.24? I
> > mean, what will happen once 2.26 is released? Wipe G:C and start over,
> > or, by using subprojects, create G:C:2.26
>
> I'm replying late, but it's better than never, isn't it? :-)
>
> So, having just G:S is clearly not enough for two reasons:
>
>  + for which distro G:S will be built?
>  + for which version of GNOME is it?
>
> If we just go for one G:S for everything, then it means we'll have the
> one version of GNOME for all distros. This sounds impossible, and
> probably not what we want.

This is actually the KDE team model, KDE:KDE4:STABLE:Desktop builds for
the last 3 supported versions - ie 11.1, 11.0, 10.3.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Novell, Inc.

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx