On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 15:42 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le dimanche 18 janvier 2009, à 14:23 +1100, Magnus Boman a écrit :
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 03:57 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
So, having just G:S is clearly not enough for two reasons:
+ for which distro G:S will be built?
Currently released version and *maybe* the previously released version
+ for which version of GNOME is it?
G:S will be the latest GNOME 2.24.x until 11.2 is released
That's my point: having "only" G:S means that we can only support ("support" as in "making packages available") 11.1 and 11.2, but not 11.0 (which will likely be still supported by the openSUSE project). Doesn't sound like a big deal, but, well, it'd still be nice since it probably won't involve a lot of work.
I'm all for this. I would like to see us use GS:2.24, GS:2.26 etc as the naming convention though. Cheers, Magnus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org