Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (124 mails)

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 07:38 +1100, Magnus Boman wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:12 +0530, Suman Manjunath wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:23 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > > 1. Should we copy all packages from G:F to a GNOME:Stable (I think we
> > > > have a G:S but don't know the state of it. We might want to start from
> > > > scratch here) and then update to 2.24.3
> > > might be a good idea, I guess
> >
> > +1
>
> Ok, so remaining questions are, do we use copypac or links? Using links
> will put some maintenance burden on the project beyond just having the
> latest stable GNOME release, since packages will break every now and
> again when patches are created for 11.1/GNOME components.
yeah, but since patches and changes are being done for 11.1 as we speak,
we really need to merge changes at some point, so I think linkpac might
be the best, even though it adds extra maintainance work. But I think
it's easier than merging by hand all packages when submitting to G:F

> Also, is G:S enough, or should we have a sub-project called G:S:2.24? I
> mean, what will happen once 2.26 is released? Wipe G:C and start over,
> or, by using subprojects, create G:C:2.26
not sure if we really want to have old GNOME versions lying around, I'd
say having STABLE and UNSTABLE should be enough. Once 2.26 is released,
it is moved to G:S, and 2.27 lands in G:F:N (or G:U)
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx