On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:23 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
1. Should we copy all packages from G:F to a GNOME:Stable (I think we have a G:S but don't know the state of it. We might want to start from scratch here) and then update to 2.24.3
might be a good idea, I guess
+1
2. For each GNOME . release (2.25.4, 2.25.5 etc), should we do a complete update in G:F:N and then later merge them to G:F (Makes it possible to use G:F as a 'stable development' branch)
I think G:F:N is good for doing the 1st mass update for a new version, so that we don't break G:F, but once we have the unstable in G:F, I guess we can just update there, and have G:F:N be just a link to G:F, so that packages get built for 11.1
Most packages submitted to G:F:N are typically built once in a personal repo somewhere (I hope :-) ). So there probably is no need for G:F:N to be a test bed for the next update to G:F.
3. Should we not do 2 and instead move G:F:N to GNOME:Unstable (again, I think we have G:U and again, perhaps we want to start from scratch)
G:U is mostly dead, so the question is just if we want to rename G:F:N to G:U.
true :-) -Suman -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org