Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (65 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-gnome] Enable G:F for 11.0 (or Factory - 1)
- From: Michael Wolf <maw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:19:09 -0500
- Message-id: <1224710349.2358.4619.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 01:21 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
We can start by enabling builds for 11.0, but disabling publishing for
11.0. That way we can get everything in a reasonably consistent state
before unleashing the packages.
Maybe it would make sense to use a different repository, with most
packages just linked to those in G:F, but with some additional patches
(to make things build) and/or with some extra deps.
But I'd rather avoid this; better to put just the deps in a different
repo.
A few people used it, but I don't think they were very happy with the
results, because nobody gave it the attention it needed to be viable.
If we can get a commitment from somebody to pay attention to the
GNOME:Factory packages on older distros, I'm all for it, but I don't
want to set up expectations that we can't meet.
Michael.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Le lundi 20 octobre 2008, à 20:14 +0800, Magnus Boman a écrit :
Hello,
At the moment, we do all this work to get the latest GNOME into
GNOME:Factory. At the same time, we don't have a "Latest GNOME" for
poeple that run the currently released version of openSUSE.
I'd like to think that one way of serving our users would be to simply
enable it to build for Factory - 1 version (11.0 as of today) as well.
This would require a couple of people that watch out for build failures
due to version dependencies that exists in Factory, but not in the
released product, and add/link them to G:F, but make sure they are
disabled for Factory.
We can start by enabling builds for 11.0, but disabling publishing for
11.0. That way we can get everything in a reasonably consistent state
before unleashing the packages.
Packages such as hal and d-bus springs to mind.
Hrm, I'm not sure I like the idea of adding old packages to G:F. But
maybe that's just me (and because this would mean I'd need to work a bit
to update the osc gnome stack ;-)).
Maybe it would make sense to use a different repository, with most
packages just linked to those in G:F, but with some additional patches
(to make things build) and/or with some extra deps.
But I'd rather avoid this; better to put just the deps in a different
repo.
Would this be something that we could do?
I'd be interested in helping out to make sure stuff builds...
I think it makes sense to have something like this. We had GNOME:STABLE
in the past. Does anyone have experience with that?
A few people used it, but I don't think they were very happy with the
results, because nobody gave it the attention it needed to be viable.
If we can get a commitment from somebody to pay attention to the
GNOME:Factory packages on older distros, I'm all for it, but I don't
want to set up expectations that we can't meet.
Michael.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |