Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (65 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-gnome] Enable G:F for 11.0 (or Factory - 1)
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:21:32 +0200
- Message-id: <20081020232132.GT8582@xxxxxxxxx>
Le lundi 20 octobre 2008, à 20:14 +0800, Magnus Boman a écrit :
Hrm, I'm not sure I like the idea of adding old packages to G:F. But
maybe that's just me (and because this would mean I'd need to work a bit
to update the osc gnome stack ;-)).
I think it makes sense to have something like this. We had GNOME:STABLE
in the past. Does anyone have experience with that?
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
At the moment, we do all this work to get the latest GNOME into
GNOME:Factory. At the same time, we don't have a "Latest GNOME" for
poeple that run the currently released version of openSUSE.
I'd like to think that one way of serving our users would be to simply
enable it to build for Factory - 1 version (11.0 as of today) as well.
This would require a couple of people that watch out for build failures
due to version dependencies that exists in Factory, but not in the
released product, and add/link them to G:F, but make sure they are
disabled for Factory.
Packages such as hal and d-bus springs to mind.
Hrm, I'm not sure I like the idea of adding old packages to G:F. But
maybe that's just me (and because this would mean I'd need to work a bit
to update the osc gnome stack ;-)).
Would this be something that we could do?
I'd be interested in helping out to make sure stuff builds...
I think it makes sense to have something like this. We had GNOME:STABLE
in the past. Does anyone have experience with that?
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |