Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (216 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-gnome] GNOME:STABLE and GNOME:UNSTABLE
- From: Igor Jagec <igorm5@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 20:22:04 +0200
- Message-id: <1191435724.6481.10.camel@munja>
On Sri, 2007-10-03 at 10:24 -0500, Michael Wolf wrote:
> * GNOME:STABLE
> We'll repopulate GNOME:STABLE with the contents of the relevant
> packages as they currently exist in Factory. As a result,
> GNOME:STABLE will soon include GNOME 2.20.0.
> Because we'll be upgrading GNOME:STABLE to 2.20.1 soon (20071017),
> we'll be copying packages, not linking them.
I must say I'm a bit confused about the repos. Speaking about GNOME
Stable repo, how stable it really is? I'm quite new to openSUSE so I'm
not quite sure what repos should I use, but I would like to use GNOME
Community and GNOME Stable (if it is really as safe as SUSE's supplied
version of GNOME).
Cheers!
--
Igor Jagec
> * GNOME:STABLE
> We'll repopulate GNOME:STABLE with the contents of the relevant
> packages as they currently exist in Factory. As a result,
> GNOME:STABLE will soon include GNOME 2.20.0.
> Because we'll be upgrading GNOME:STABLE to 2.20.1 soon (20071017),
> we'll be copying packages, not linking them.
I must say I'm a bit confused about the repos. Speaking about GNOME
Stable repo, how stable it really is? I'm quite new to openSUSE so I'm
not quite sure what repos should I use, but I would like to use GNOME
Community and GNOME Stable (if it is really as safe as SUSE's supplied
version of GNOME).
Cheers!
--
Igor Jagec
| < Previous | Next > |