Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (216 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-gnome] Update GNOME:STABLE to 2.20, fate ofGNOME:UNSTABLE
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:43:15 -0400
- Message-id: <1191242595.3915.389.camel@gambit>
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 14:06 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 11:59 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> > Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 15:35 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> >
> > > > What about GNOME:UNSTABLE? If anybody volunteer to start update to 2.21,
> > > > there is a chance. Otherwise, we can freeze or drop this repository for
> > > > some time.
> > > >
> > > I think it makes a lot of sense to use G:U for 2.21/2.23/etc. In the
> > > longer term, we should get coordinated with the GNOME Build Brigade
> > > (http://live.gnome.org/BuildBrigade) to do compilation tests and binary
> > > packages for unstable GNOME releases.
> >
> > Yes. But is there any 2.21 package already? If not, we should stop/drop
> > G:U to not waste resources having exactly the same in G:S and G:U.
> >
> > We could revive it whenever we'll start with 2.21.
> >
> no, no 2.21 releases yet, so yes, we can wait until there is a release,
> or just start adding unstable packages from SVN versions, or something
> like that. But yes, I guess we can drop it until then if it's wasting
> resources
The draft schedule is at: http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyone
So 2.21.1 packages will be available in < 1 month.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Novell, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |