Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (216 mails)

[Nikolay Paskov <niki@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

May be it will be a good idea to have also a GNOME:TESTING branch in
order to test new releases which are officially stable. I know that it
sounds a little bit like debian approach but it is still better,
packages which are quite new and have know unresolved issues to remain
in testing till most of them are fixed.

Nikolay Paskov (a.k.a. matematic)
 
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 19:56 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 15:35 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> > Hallo.
> > 
> > I am just thinking about update of GNOME:STABLE to GNOME 2.20.
> > 
> > In difference to previous versions, we may stick it to factory for
> > awhile by using package links. Later we can copy frozen packages there
> > physically.
> > 
> > What about GNOME:UNSTABLE? If anybody volunteer to start update to 2.21,
> > there is a chance. Otherwise, we can freeze or drop this repository for
> > some time.
> > 
> I think it makes a lot of sense to use G:U for 2.21/2.23/etc. In the
> longer term, we should get coordinated with the GNOME Build Brigade
> (http://live.gnome.org/BuildBrigade) to do compilation tests and binary
> packages for unstable GNOME releases.
> -- 
> Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx