Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (127 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-gnome] Brasero vs gnome-baker
- From: Calvin Gaisford <cgaisford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:33:27 -0600
- Message-id: <1187372007.8058.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:42 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:48 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 08:46 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 22:48 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:22 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > > > We need to (quickly) decide on a defaultCD/DVD burning solution for
> > > > > 10.3. gnome-baker used to be kind of defacto, but brasero seems to be
> > > > > the new hotness. What to people think?
> > > > >
> > > > > Brasero:
> > > > > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/jproseve/openSUSE_Factory/
> > > > >
> > > > > gnome-baker:
> > > > > Factory
> > > > >
> > > > > -JP
> > > > > --
> > > > > JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Novell, Inc.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I guess the real questions is... does the openSUSE team have a
> > > > preference for the underlying code of one versus the other.
> > > > will the team be working on improving the chosen one?
> > >
> > > Well, the more recent active development of brasero is a plus, but
> > > gnome-baker seems a little more mature.
> > >
> > > In the end we just want to ship what the openSUSE users want :-).
> > >
> > > -JP
> > > --
> > > JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Novell, Inc.
> > >
> > Does one of them fit in better or is more compatible with the overall
> > desktop programming language. since they are both fairly equal in
> > features, could we get a devs pro\con list with regards to ease of
> > integration. i.e is one more compatible with future mono apps? are there
> > any "QT" vs "GTK" issues?
>
> Both use GTK, both are written in C, so there's not much to choose
> there.
>
> -JP
> --
> JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Novell, Inc.
In my quick and short experiment with both, I would vote for
gnome-baker. Brasero reported some of my media as not being compatible
with gstreamer where gnome-baker not only let me use the media, it
handled it better.
The interfaces both seemed to be on par with other burning type software
although Brasero gives you the Fisher-Price introduction to burning
(maybe some people like that, I hate it).
So I say we use gnome-baker.
-Calvin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:48 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 08:46 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 22:48 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:22 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > > > We need to (quickly) decide on a defaultCD/DVD burning solution for
> > > > > 10.3. gnome-baker used to be kind of defacto, but brasero seems to be
> > > > > the new hotness. What to people think?
> > > > >
> > > > > Brasero:
> > > > > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/jproseve/openSUSE_Factory/
> > > > >
> > > > > gnome-baker:
> > > > > Factory
> > > > >
> > > > > -JP
> > > > > --
> > > > > JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Novell, Inc.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I guess the real questions is... does the openSUSE team have a
> > > > preference for the underlying code of one versus the other.
> > > > will the team be working on improving the chosen one?
> > >
> > > Well, the more recent active development of brasero is a plus, but
> > > gnome-baker seems a little more mature.
> > >
> > > In the end we just want to ship what the openSUSE users want :-).
> > >
> > > -JP
> > > --
> > > JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Novell, Inc.
> > >
> > Does one of them fit in better or is more compatible with the overall
> > desktop programming language. since they are both fairly equal in
> > features, could we get a devs pro\con list with regards to ease of
> > integration. i.e is one more compatible with future mono apps? are there
> > any "QT" vs "GTK" issues?
>
> Both use GTK, both are written in C, so there's not much to choose
> there.
>
> -JP
> --
> JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Novell, Inc.
In my quick and short experiment with both, I would vote for
gnome-baker. Brasero reported some of my media as not being compatible
with gstreamer where gnome-baker not only let me use the media, it
handled it better.
The interfaces both seemed to be on par with other burning type software
although Brasero gives you the Fisher-Price introduction to burning
(maybe some people like that, I hate it).
So I say we use gnome-baker.
-Calvin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |