Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (127 mails)

[JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:48 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 08:46 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 22:48 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:22 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > > We need to (quickly) decide on a defaultCD/DVD burning solution for
> > > > 10.3.  gnome-baker used to be kind of defacto, but brasero seems to be
> > > > the new hotness.  What to people think?
> > > > 
> > > > Brasero:
> > > > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/jproseve/openSUSE_Factory/
> > > > 
> > > > gnome-baker:
> > > > Factory
> > > > 
> > > > -JP
> > > > -- 
> > > > JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Novell, Inc.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I guess the real questions is... does the openSUSE team have a
> > > preference for the underlying code of one versus the other.
> > > will the team be working on improving the chosen one? 
> > 
> > Well, the more recent active development of brasero is a plus, but
> > gnome-baker seems a little more mature.
> > 
> > In the end we just want to ship what the openSUSE users want :-).
> > 
> > -JP
> > -- 
> > JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Novell, Inc.
> > 
> Does one of them fit in better or is more compatible with the overall
> desktop programming language. since they are both fairly equal in
> features, could we get a devs pro\con list with regards to ease of
> integration. i.e is one more compatible with future mono apps? are there
> any "QT" vs "GTK" issues?

Both use GTK, both are written in C, so there's not much to choose
there.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Novell, Inc.

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx