Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (127 mails)

[James Tremblay <jamesat@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 08:46 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 22:48 -0400, James Tremblay wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:22 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > We need to (quickly) decide on a defaultCD/DVD burning solution for
> > > 10.3.  gnome-baker used to be kind of defacto, but brasero seems to be
> > > the new hotness.  What to people think?
> > > 
> > > Brasero:
> > > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/jproseve/openSUSE_Factory/
> > > 
> > > gnome-baker:
> > > Factory
> > > 
> > > -JP
> > > -- 
> > > JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Novell, Inc.
> > > 
> > 
> > I guess the real questions is... does the openSUSE team have a
> > preference for the underlying code of one versus the other.
> > will the team be working on improving the chosen one? 
> 
> Well, the more recent active development of brasero is a plus, but
> gnome-baker seems a little more mature.
> 
> In the end we just want to ship what the openSUSE users want :-).
> 
> -JP
> -- 
> JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Novell, Inc.
> 
Does one of them fit in better or is more compatible with the overall
desktop programming language. since they are both fairly equal in
features, could we get a devs pro\con list with regards to ease of
integration. i.e is one more compatible with future mono apps? are there
any "QT" vs "GTK" issues?
-- 
James Tremblay
Director of Technology
Newmarket School District
Newmarket,NH
http://en.opensuse.org/Education
"let's make a difference"

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx