Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (44 mails)

[JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 14:32 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> 
> > We really need to have factory building in the BuildService.  This will
> > avoid all these hacks.
> 
> Yes, it is. Or even better, construct FACTORY as a set of BuildService
> repositories, e. g.:
> 
> FACTORY=Coresystem+KDE:KDE3+GNOME:STABLE+...
> 
> 
> > If we have release date of end of september for 10.3, I assume that
> > GNOME 2.20 will go in at the last second - but this means that we need
> > to have with Beta1 already a first preview in factory and then follow
> > with each GNOME beta,

The will be fine, GNOME should be feature frozen by the end of July.

> This implies staying to be in sync with GNOME:UNSTABLE for the whole
> time.

Well, I hate to think this would be in Factory for the first couple of
releases, ie 2.19.1 and 2.19.2 at least.  I think we're likely to have a
not-so-useable GNOME during that time.  At the same time, I want the
early testing, so figuring out the FACTORY issue is key.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Novell, Inc.

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx