Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (44 mails)

[Stanislav Brabec <sbrabec@xxxxxxx>]

James Ogley wrote:

> > And should we continue with 2.19 in Factory or continue there with 2.18?
> > What do you think?
> 
> Will we get 2.20 in time for 10.3?
> 
> I think I've suggested it before but maybe G:U could have a Factory
> target added so we (in this instance) stick with 2.18 in Factory so that
> we have a stable GNOME release in 10.3 and start building 2.19 in G:U.
> Then, once 10.3 is released, import the work from G:U into Factory and
> disable the Factory target on it until the next GNOME development cycle
> comes around.

Nice idea, but hard to realize. We need a NO-GO flag for SuSE
Autobuild/Factory, otherwise people will modify tens or hundreds of
packages in Factory with a lot of minor patches and somebody have to
spent several days or weeks with reviewing them and merging when 2.20
will come.

I remember this problem from December, when I did /opt/gnome -> /usr
move.

Proposal:

NO-GO package will have a .buildservice file in its repository.

.buildservice will contain a string with BS project and package name,
where it is maintained. More lines mean, that more versions are
maintained.

Autobuild team will reject manual updates of these files.

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravem,

Stanislav Brabec
software developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o.                          e-mail: sbrabec@xxxxxxx
Lihovarská 1060/12                            tel: +420 284 028 966
190 00 Praha 9                                fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic                                http://www.suse.cz/

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx