Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (44 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-gnome] 2.19 Plan
- From: Stanislav Brabec <sbrabec@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:35:31 +0200
- Message-id: <1177338932.23189.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
JP Rosevear wrote:
> We need a plan to cover GNOME 2.19 now that its being released.
> Normally I would say move 2.18.1 to G:S and keep updating it there, but
> in this case we have the /opt/gnome -> /usr move to deal with, we'd
> break anyone on 10.2 and older for sure. Any thoughts on what to do?
Yes, it is a big change, but I guess it will not break.
I am using 10.2+G:U it on my current work desktop without any problems.
For older we'll break, because new hal dependent stuff does not compile,
which causes breakage of many packages as a consequence (including gedit
in the chain). We may need to fix it or disable somehow a not supported
subset.
Before doing it, please let me know. I plan t backup static snapshot of
the very last version of G:S sources and binaries somewhere.
And should we continue with 2.19 in Factory or continue there with 2.18?
What do you think?
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec@xxxxxxx
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> We need a plan to cover GNOME 2.19 now that its being released.
> Normally I would say move 2.18.1 to G:S and keep updating it there, but
> in this case we have the /opt/gnome -> /usr move to deal with, we'd
> break anyone on 10.2 and older for sure. Any thoughts on what to do?
Yes, it is a big change, but I guess it will not break.
I am using 10.2+G:U it on my current work desktop without any problems.
For older we'll break, because new hal dependent stuff does not compile,
which causes breakage of many packages as a consequence (including gedit
in the chain). We may need to fix it or disable somehow a not supported
subset.
Before doing it, please let me know. I plan t backup static snapshot of
the very last version of G:S sources and binaries somewhere.
And should we continue with 2.19 in Factory or continue there with 2.18?
What do you think?
--
Best Regards / S pozdravem,
Stanislav Brabec
software developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec@xxxxxxx
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |