Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-features (408 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[openFATE 308262] repo naming convention
- From: fate_noreply@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:22:20 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <feature-308262-4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Feature changed by: Ralph Ulrich (ulenrich)
Feature #308262, revision 4
Title: repo naming convention
openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed
Priority
Requester: Important
Requested by: Ralph Ulrich (ulenrich)
Description:
Please openSUSE do make yourself easy to understand. The repo namings
are in such a state that even openSUSE long time users get confused. So
nobody can edit the wiki to inform users right now.
examples:
a) http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/openSUSE-current/ is more
than a year old.
? same as: http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/openSUSE-stable/
b) http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/11.2-RC2/
? same as: http://download.opensuse.org/factory-snapshot/
but coolo said: "factory and 11.2 are two distinct projects since"
Factory is normally rolling... But what is a rolling snapshot ???
Solution: Some naming convention:
1. never name a release current but stable
2. name repo before release testing (like Debian)
3. rename factory unstable (like Debian)
Rationale: "snapshot" normally is a repository of a point in the past
and should not point to the future (as now of Prerelease of 11.2 you
have empty snapshots to be released tomorrow).
Discussion:
#1: Ralph Ulrich (ulenrich) (2009-11-03 17:53:10)
Typical example of a user confused about bad namings:
"But I see that the factory repository has the version 3.5.3 of
Firefox, whereas the factory-snapshot repository (11.2 RC2) has version
3.5.4. How can a *snapshot* have a newer version???"
seen at
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-11/msg00014.html
+ #2: Ralph Ulrich (ulenrich) (2009-11-03 18:21:40)
+ Another example:
+ "If you want to test: the live and net isos are under
+ http://download.opensuse.org/factory/iso/
(http://download.opensuse.org/factory/iso/)
+ (as usual) and the 11.2 repo is uptodate."
+ Found http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-11/msg00033.html
+
+ Even an Insider as Coolo doesn't know openSUSE-11.2RC2 doesn't belong
+ to factory any more?
--
openSUSE Feature:
https://features.opensuse.org/308262
Feature #308262, revision 4
Title: repo naming convention
openSUSE-11.3: Unconfirmed
Priority
Requester: Important
Requested by: Ralph Ulrich (ulenrich)
Description:
Please openSUSE do make yourself easy to understand. The repo namings
are in such a state that even openSUSE long time users get confused. So
nobody can edit the wiki to inform users right now.
examples:
a) http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/openSUSE-current/ is more
than a year old.
? same as: http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/openSUSE-stable/
b) http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/11.2-RC2/
? same as: http://download.opensuse.org/factory-snapshot/
but coolo said: "factory and 11.2 are two distinct projects since"
Factory is normally rolling... But what is a rolling snapshot ???
Solution: Some naming convention:
1. never name a release current but stable
2. name repo before release testing (like Debian)
3. rename factory unstable (like Debian)
Rationale: "snapshot" normally is a repository of a point in the past
and should not point to the future (as now of Prerelease of 11.2 you
have empty snapshots to be released tomorrow).
Discussion:
#1: Ralph Ulrich (ulenrich) (2009-11-03 17:53:10)
Typical example of a user confused about bad namings:
"But I see that the factory repository has the version 3.5.3 of
Firefox, whereas the factory-snapshot repository (11.2 RC2) has version
3.5.4. How can a *snapshot* have a newer version???"
seen at
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-11/msg00014.html
+ #2: Ralph Ulrich (ulenrich) (2009-11-03 18:21:40)
+ Another example:
+ "If you want to test: the live and net isos are under
+ http://download.opensuse.org/factory/iso/
(http://download.opensuse.org/factory/iso/)
+ (as usual) and the 11.2 repo is uptodate."
+ Found http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-11/msg00033.html
+
+ Even an Insider as Coolo doesn't know openSUSE-11.2RC2 doesn't belong
+ to factory any more?
--
openSUSE Feature:
https://features.opensuse.org/308262
| < Previous | Next > |