Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-features (829 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[openFATE 306381] Read Only mode for anonymous users in Web Client
- From: fate_noreply@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:16:20 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <feature-306381-20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Feature changed by: Andreas Jaeger (a_jaeger)
Feature #306381, revision 20
Title: Read Only mode for anonymous users in Web Client
- Buildservice: Evaluation
+ Buildservice: Duplicate of #306192
Priority
Requester: Important
Projectmanager: Important
Requested by: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse)
Description:
The OBS Web Client shall offer a read only mode for not logged in
users.
Goals:
* The current projects and packages shall become browseable
* Search engines shall be able to index our content
* Our sources, including the patches should be accessable.
* Log files shall be accessable for developers without login.
What should not be accessable: Of course no write operations and
everything which is causing too much load on our servers. The system
must be still usable for packagers as higher goal. This means:
* No build result downloads via api
* No monitor pages due to the cause load ?
-
+ Relations:
+ - feature/duplicate: 306192
Discussion:
#1: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse) (2009-04-22 13:09:18)
Andreas, do you think it is easier to write own read-only pages or to
adapt the existing developer pages for a read-only mode ?
#3: Andreas Bauer (abauer12345) (2009-04-22 14:16:08) (reply to #1)
What do you mean by developer pages?
#4: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse) (2009-04-22 14:36:14) (reply to #3)
Basically every existing page behind build.opensuse.org
#12: Andreas Bauer (abauer12345) (2009-04-28 11:45:52) (reply to #4)
I wouldn't put much effort into adapting the current web UI, instead
focus on getting it right in the new UI.
#2: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-22 13:34:07)
I also request to make build logs available.
We have a streaming architecture that should be able to handle the
load.
#5: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse) (2009-04-22 14:36:36) (reply to #2)
Log files are already mentioned in the feature description.
#7: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-24 13:24:53) (reply to #5)
I don't understand what is meant by banning 'build results'. Neither
osc result nor osc rbl then? Good.
#8: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse) (2009-04-27 09:37:37) (reply to #7)
The binary packages, like rpm, deb or iso files should not be
downloadable without login via the API.
#9: Michael Schröder (mlschroe) (2009-04-27 10:26:02) (reply to #8)
Why's that? I can't think of any reason for this requirement.
#10: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse) (2009-04-27 10:39:20) (reply to #9)
I do not want to see slashdot announcements for example with download
URLs of our iso images for example, just because the publishing has
been disabled by intention of the developer of the project.
It would just kill us by bandwidth and would take away the decision
when to release from the project owners.
#11: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-27 11:04:23) (reply to #9)
( Possible compromise:If publishing is off, API asks for password, if
publishing is on, API allows free download? )
I'd like to focus this feature on freely available sources, patches and
build logs. Freely available binaries is a secondary issue. I am fine
with Adrian's clarification.
#6: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-24 13:17:25)
URLs like
https://api.opensuse.org/source/home:jnweiger/fat-gundel/fat-gundel.c
should not come up with an extra API iChains popup.
I believe everything under https://api.opensuse.org/source/ could be
freely downloadable.
#13: Stephan Binner (beineri) (2009-06-04 18:35:15)
This sounds like a dupe of Fate#306192.
#14: Stephen Kellat (skellat) (2009-06-14 23:27:23) (reply to #13)
I would not necessarily regard this as a dupe. Fate#306192 wants to
change the barriers to entry to read and write in OBS. This would,
instead, allow people to dip a toe in the water to see but not change
what is there before joining the group.
#15: Stephan Binner (beineri) (2009-07-01 20:13:16) (reply to #14)
Fate#306192 is for sure NOT about allowing anonymous users to write in
OBS.
--
openSUSE Feature:
https://features.opensuse.org/306381
Feature #306381, revision 20
Title: Read Only mode for anonymous users in Web Client
- Buildservice: Evaluation
+ Buildservice: Duplicate of #306192
Priority
Requester: Important
Projectmanager: Important
Requested by: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse)
Description:
The OBS Web Client shall offer a read only mode for not logged in
users.
Goals:
* The current projects and packages shall become browseable
* Search engines shall be able to index our content
* Our sources, including the patches should be accessable.
* Log files shall be accessable for developers without login.
What should not be accessable: Of course no write operations and
everything which is causing too much load on our servers. The system
must be still usable for packagers as higher goal. This means:
* No build result downloads via api
* No monitor pages due to the cause load ?
-
+ Relations:
+ - feature/duplicate: 306192
Discussion:
#1: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse) (2009-04-22 13:09:18)
Andreas, do you think it is easier to write own read-only pages or to
adapt the existing developer pages for a read-only mode ?
#3: Andreas Bauer (abauer12345) (2009-04-22 14:16:08) (reply to #1)
What do you mean by developer pages?
#4: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse) (2009-04-22 14:36:14) (reply to #3)
Basically every existing page behind build.opensuse.org
#12: Andreas Bauer (abauer12345) (2009-04-28 11:45:52) (reply to #4)
I wouldn't put much effort into adapting the current web UI, instead
focus on getting it right in the new UI.
#2: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-22 13:34:07)
I also request to make build logs available.
We have a streaming architecture that should be able to handle the
load.
#5: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse) (2009-04-22 14:36:36) (reply to #2)
Log files are already mentioned in the feature description.
#7: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-24 13:24:53) (reply to #5)
I don't understand what is meant by banning 'build results'. Neither
osc result nor osc rbl then? Good.
#8: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse) (2009-04-27 09:37:37) (reply to #7)
The binary packages, like rpm, deb or iso files should not be
downloadable without login via the API.
#9: Michael Schröder (mlschroe) (2009-04-27 10:26:02) (reply to #8)
Why's that? I can't think of any reason for this requirement.
#10: Adrian Schröter (adriansuse) (2009-04-27 10:39:20) (reply to #9)
I do not want to see slashdot announcements for example with download
URLs of our iso images for example, just because the publishing has
been disabled by intention of the developer of the project.
It would just kill us by bandwidth and would take away the decision
when to release from the project owners.
#11: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-27 11:04:23) (reply to #9)
( Possible compromise:If publishing is off, API asks for password, if
publishing is on, API allows free download? )
I'd like to focus this feature on freely available sources, patches and
build logs. Freely available binaries is a secondary issue. I am fine
with Adrian's clarification.
#6: Juergen Weigert (jnweiger) (2009-04-24 13:17:25)
URLs like
https://api.opensuse.org/source/home:jnweiger/fat-gundel/fat-gundel.c
should not come up with an extra API iChains popup.
I believe everything under https://api.opensuse.org/source/ could be
freely downloadable.
#13: Stephan Binner (beineri) (2009-06-04 18:35:15)
This sounds like a dupe of Fate#306192.
#14: Stephen Kellat (skellat) (2009-06-14 23:27:23) (reply to #13)
I would not necessarily regard this as a dupe. Fate#306192 wants to
change the barriers to entry to read and write in OBS. This would,
instead, allow people to dip a toe in the water to see but not change
what is there before joining the group.
#15: Stephan Binner (beineri) (2009-07-01 20:13:16) (reply to #14)
Fate#306192 is for sure NOT about allowing anonymous users to write in
OBS.
--
openSUSE Feature:
https://features.opensuse.org/306381
| < Previous | Next > |