Hi Linda, being around for so long, you really should know better ;-) Am 21.05.19 um 04:42 schrieb L A Walsh:
I went to install the updated flac rpm from my local repo and noticed a doc rpm as well that I wanted to look at.
When I installed them I found the rpm flac-1.3.2-3.2.x86_64 gave an error obsoleting the documentation package: flac-doc-1.3.2-2.3.noarch
flac-doc is obsoleted by (installed) flac-1.3.2-3.2.x86_64
But looking at the packages, the x86 doesn't contain any of the doc files except an authors and a readme. and 2 manpages. The doc file contains 272 files that are not in the flac-binary directory.
https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/multimedia:libs/flac?linkrev=base&rev=55 Probably the doc package was dropped to avoid huge build dependencies (doxygen), when everyone interested in getting this documentation can easily build it from the source.
Then adding more weirdness:
/usr/bin/flac --version flac 1.3.0 rpm -qf /usr/bin/flac flac-1.3.2-3.2.x86_64
I.e. the bin file rpm is suppose to be 1.3.2 (current latest version), but the flac binary thinks it is still back at 1.3.0.
That's where I wonder where your previously demonstrated unix skill have gone ;-) strolchi:~ # rpm -q --queryformat '%{name}-%{version}-%{release}.%{arch}\n%{distribution}\n' flac flac-1.3.2-3.2.x86_64 openSUSE Tumbleweed strolchi:~ # flac --version flac 1.3.2 strolchi:~ # ldd /usr/bin/flac linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffdc85e9000) libFLAC.so.8 => /usr/lib64/libFLAC.so.8 (0x00007fee44cf1000) libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fee44bad000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fee449e8000) libogg.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libogg.so.0 (0x00007fee449df000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fee4504d000) strolchi:~ # strings /usr/bin/flac|grep ^1.3.2 strolchi:~ # strings /usr/lib64/libFLAC.so.8|grep ^1.3.2 1.3.2 strolchi:~ # rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libFLAC.so.8 libFLAC8-1.3.2-3.2.x86_64
I'm guessing no one really uses these things?
I checked on the opensuse list and they say their version is unaffected.
Not really sure why they would have a complete different (and working) version with the one in tumbleweed looking a bit broken...
Is this still a problem in recent releases that needs a bug report?
No. It never was a problem in any release. -- Stefan Seyfried "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." -- Richard Feynman -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org