Hi Jim- I do have several horses in this race, and while it may be sensible in the near-term it does not address the underlying issue of insecure file systems regardless of their implementation. Per my previous reply, I strongly recommend the security risk be contained so that any file system regardless of its risks/vulnerabilities can be utilized. Pretty much all file systems have had or eventually will be a security risk regardless of implementation. Addressing this risk now should prevent future issues. Best, Jim On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 18:46 +0000, Jim Henderson wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 13:42:14 -0500, Jim E Bonfiglio wrote:
Hi Jim- so far as I'm aware, thinking does not necessarily match reality. I couldn't tell you how many attend that conference, but I do wonder what a representative sample of (open)SUSE users would report as "necessary" file systems. Without such a sample this proposed change appears quite reckless.
Well, like I said, I don't have a horse in this race. It seems to me like a sensible move, with an easy solution for those who really need these filesystems.
-- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org